“
Rating: ★★★★
There was a time when Westerns engaged audiences on the level of a simple morality play where audiences knew who the good and bad guys were and were excited and entertained by watching the latter get their comeuppance. Then came along Sam Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch, which removed that moral façade and showed how real violence was not as sanitized. Everyone was a victim of the chaos and bloodshed, and no one, good guy, bad guy, or innocent bystander, was immune to the scarring, whether physical or emotional. In the Westerns that followed, the violence combined with more reflective and intellectual dialogue to express morally complex ideas about the human condition.
James Mangold’s
The movie opens in the home of Dan Evans (Christian Bale), a man seeking to rebuild his own life after he lost a leg in the Civil War. He is tired of the looks of shame and disdain from his wife, Alice (Gretchen Mol) and kids, William (Logan Lerman) and Mark (Benjamin Petry) and he is barely trying to keep his ranch afloat in the face of overdue loans. That chance seems to arrive to him when he seizes the rare and perilous opportunity to transport a captured infamous robber and murderer, Ben Wade (Russell Crowe) to his prison train for a payment of 200 dollars that will help cover his debts.
Dan’s posse includes Doc Potter (Alan Tudyk), Byron McElroy (Peter Fonda), a bounty hunter who has a personal vested interest in bringing Wade to justice, and others who work under railroad worker, Grayson Butterfield (Dallas Roberts). Wade has his own posse now led by his right-hand man, Charlie Prince (Ben Foster), who gazes with snaky eyes at Dan’s crew and follow them to make sure they never make it to the
The film’s focus is really on Dan and Ben, two opposed men who know they cannot trust each other but may have to anyway and even bare their own souls to fight for their lives. Ben is a scarier criminal because he can actually intellectualize about his evil deeds with erudite irony. He is smarter than anyone else can catch on and intuits his situations so quickly that it dumbfounds everyone including himself.
His philosophizing of his hedonistic behavior becomes a source of temptation for Dan, the hero who fears what hidden darker side he will unleash in his quest to redeem his status by bringing Ben to justice. That’s made more complicated when William sneakily tags along and seems eerily fascinated by Ben’s machismo posturing. Such ideas bring greater depth to the gun battles that happen in between where Ben’s violent nature can hurt but also help the livelihood of the posse against other unforeseen enemies.
To make this complex character study come to life, director James Mangold has rightly picked great actors like Christian Bale and Russell Crowe to embody them. There is good acting you recognize and greater acting you hardly notice and when Bale and Crowe exchange dialogue, we reflect on the meaning of the words instead of realizing how well they are really delivering them. Their eloquent conversations make us hardly anticipate another action scene and have us guessing who will be the last man standing.
Both actors really disappear into their characters but the real surprise is Ben Foster who has a silent, steely gaze that peers into the camera. His performance is crucial to establishing the dread that forces people to succumb to their weaker and more survivalist natures. That only becomes truer when some members of the escorting posse make surprising decisions based on the pressure Foster weighs down.
James Mangold’s directorial efforts vary wildly from cop thrillers like Cop Land to Girl, Interrupted, Walk the Line, and now this. He directs his action sequences here with timing and precision but he is always more interested in exploring the concept of desperation within his characters. Watching this film, the best he has ever directed, finally made me understand the common theme that runs through all of his vastly different films – people who seek balance and stability despite their dissatisfaction with their place in the world.
The best Westerns have the unique ability above any other genre to visually show pages of commentary on the complicated nature of morality in a violent world and




4 comments:
Hey there,
This is Caroline from SocialRank.
I am trying to get in touch with you but couldn't find your email address.
We're launching a new Web 2.0 site dedicated to Movie lovers and we have started indexing your blog posts as part of our
content filter.
I'd like to send you an invite to a beta preview. Can you get back to me with your email address.
Mine is caroline@dailymovieguide.com
Kind regards,
Caroline
www.SocialRank.com
Hey John, this is an excellent review of this movie. I also blog about movies, but from an employee's standpoint. If you like, we can exchange links, let me know. You can find me at
www.intermissionatwork.com
"Erudite" is definetly the word to use for your review. Nice stuff! I'm linking to you if that's ok. Come over and check out my reviews. Most recent movie reviews are Superbad and 1408.
Cheers.
http://johnskibeat.blogspot.com/
I was looking forward to a good western, and although many elements of this movie are good, I just didn't get the part where Crowe's and Bale's character have a moment of clarity and help one another. I didn't buy the motive for it, and felt it somehow false. Or maybe the motive for which it was done was a bit forced and contrived. At least that was my thought.
Post a Comment