“Cloverfield”
Rating: ★★★
Cloverfield seems to be the culmination of the recent trend of handheld hyper-realism in action and horror movies. After The Blair Witch Project popularized the shaky camera technique, numerous films from the Bourne and the 28 Days Later series to The Kingdom have used it to place viewers in the frantic rush of the action with varying degrees of success. Now, with the shakiest camera available, the disaster genre gets its turn with this movie that depicts a relentless monster attack on
The film, of course, is the one that has been surrounded by Internet hype and speculation ever since its trailer was shown attached to Transformers with just the producers’ name, J.J. Abrams and the release date, 1-18-08, and no official title. The big money shot was the head of the Statue of Liberty falling to the street in the midst of a monster attack that strikes
It is a credit to Abrams, director Matt Reeves and writer Drew Goddard that they have not buried themselves under their clever ad campaign, unlike The Blair Witch Project, which became nothing more than a gimmick after the elaborately fake back story on the website prevented us from really using our imaginations to figure out whatever was going on in the dark. The filmmakers here have kept their big creature as their secret weapon and the movie itself is smart enough to reveal the monster’s true nature piece by piece like bread crumbs. And no, I will not reveal what the creature really looks like or how it gestates other than to observe that I think it could probably have Godzilla for breakfast.
We don’t even really see much of a back story of the origin of the monster, just like the group of twenty-something year olds initially celebrating that going-away party for Rob (Michael Stahl-David) would not from their limited perspective. The first half hour is just focused on that surprise party as Rob is about to head to Japan for a new job (a not so subtle nod to how Abrams wants to make this the YouTube generation's successor to Godzilla). One of the guys, Hud (T.J. Miller) starts filming farewell testimonials from all of the party guests with his video camera. He also keenly has his eyes on Marlena (Lizzy Caplan), who is only a friend of a friend of Rob and has only stopped by on the way to meet up with others later. All of a sudden, a rumbling explosion goes off in the distance and an earthquake shakes the apartment. They go up to the roof to investigate until another gigantic explosion sends fiery balls all throughout lower
From that point on, the movie is a generally engaging, if exhausting thrill ride, as we follow five people including Rob, his brother, Jason (Mike Vogel) and his girlfriend, Lily (Jessica Lucas), Hud, who holds the camera throughout most of the film, and Marlena. The story is not without a few clichés like the motivation for Rob and reluctantly his friends to go towards the middle of the city to rescue Beth (Odette Yustman), a friend he had a one-time fling with but for whom he may have more serious feelings. But the film at least avoids creating any phony character development and simply shows these survivors doing what they can to reach her at the 49th floor of a high-rise apartment leaning against another skyscraper near
One issue that has come up inevitably is whether using imagery referencing 9/11 such as the leaning skyscraper, the
It is also worth noting that the realism extends all the way through to the conclusion as the story progresses only as a monstrous invasion can within the circumstances. Fair warning, besides the fact that the shaky camera movement is as quease-inducing as it can get (even for an average person, Hud does not seem to be much of a cameraman), there are a few bloody deaths that do push the boundary of the film’s PG-13 rating. The fact that the film does not sugar-coat its horror material or cheapen it with unnecessary machismo, patriotic heroics makes whatever comment the story tries to imply more effective and keeps it from feeling crass and insensitive.
From a technical standpoint, it is rather impressive how the film maintains the illusion that we are watching crude, video camera footage. The visual effects seamlessly match the restless camera movement and the actors do a good job of reacting as everyday people would against the catastrophe often within long, unbroken takes (though I imagine the editors squeezed in a few breaks in between the herky-jerky swish-pans). I am still not sure, however, how the camera manages to endure what it does throughout or how Rob is able to get good cell phone reception to talk to Beth and others while walking through the subway tunnel all the way from lower
In the end though, Cloverfield successfully goes beyond being just a marketing ploy and works to provide some good scares. It is at the right, spare length at 84 minutes and the filmmakers respect the classical Jaws tradition by preserving a full view of the creature until 70 minutes in. I only hope, however, that, for all of the film’s effective use of the handheld technique, the camera does not get any more erratic than this.




7 comments:
Cloverfield was a great movie. Made some people sick in the theatre but all in all was really good.
When is Hollywood going to make a movie about World War 3?
You could do it in the same fashion as Cloverfield, that would be cool and scary.
Not to sound like I am a warmonger, but I think that would be cool to setup a movie series. There is a lot of stuff on youtube about this. Saw one the other day.
The link is below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cyxm1FI1Akk
I was a bit taken aback at the lack of back story, but I like your explanation: we're seeing it through the eyes of these 20-year-old survivors... they wouldn't be aware of backstory (or conclusion) either.
Another excellent review from you John. I saw Cloverfield as well and I loved it. I really don't know what they're going to do with a sequel, but I am anticipating it.
Found it a little overwhelming in parts and the camera work disorientating but found it an interesting experience none the less, certainly worth seeing if you haven't already. It's kind of like 'War of the Worlds' meets 'Blair Witch' though a lot better than the later.
i must admit that i liked the movie cloverfield..scary and thrilling
it made me dizzy because of the camera movements in that movie, i want to vomit but i didn't i would miss parts of the movie.. hehehe...
but other people behind me dont like it... they have problems on them.
they are classical and old fashion they dont really have should i say intelligence in movies? what's the word tell me....... awts
the camera was shaky, true, but at least it was an original way to communicate everything that was going on
Just thought this film was dire.
Post a Comment