Rating: ★★★
Few corruption cases have been as baffling as the one presented in Clint Eastwood’s new movie, Changeling. Think about it. What went through the minds of those
Clint Eastwood’s latest is based on these true but now somewhat forgotten events in the late 1920s to 1930s. As a director who has grown more ambitious and prolific with age, he also seems ever more deliberate to place a photo-negative on the numerous action roles he played as an actor in the past. I am actually surprised he waited this long to dramatize a real-life case as a representation of the police corruption that Dirty Harry Callahan would certainly have understood and been further disgruntled with.
The movie stars Angelina Jolie as the mother, Christine Collins, a telephone operator living in the suburbs of Los Angeles and single mother to nine-year-old Walter (Gattlin Griffith). One afternoon in March 1928, coming home late after filling in for another employee at work, she finds that her son has disappeared. She frantically calls the police only to be told that their policy is that they do not consider a boy missing until after 24 hours. Days and months pass, as various people around her pray for her son's safe return including Reverend Gustav Briegleb (John Malkovich), who makes radio broadcasts criticizing and condemning the corrupt deeds of the
When she sees the boy at the train station, however, she immediately sees that this boy (Devon Conti) they have brought back is not Walter. Jones assures this is really him, as the boy recalls the Collins home address. Despite her doubts, she reluctantly takes him home until she measures that this boy's height is a full three inches shorter. When she goes to confront Jones about this, he snidely accuses her of avoiding returning to her motherly responsibilities. Even when a psychiatrist visits, he only harasses her, saying that this is indeed Walter after providing a phony explanation for the height difference.
She gets further evidence supporting her claim from the family dentist who immediately recognizes that the dental records do not match and Walter’s school teacher and her class who do not recognize this new boy. Just before she is about to go on one of Briegleb’s broadcasts with this information, however, Jones orders that she be placed in the mental hospital under the care of Dr. Jonathan Steele (Denis O’Hare). There, Christine meets another fellow patient, Carol Dexter (Amy Ryan) and sees that most every woman in the ward has been put there to keep quiet about a potential scandal. Meanwhile, Briegleb, catching on to her sudden absence, soon steps in as a crusading ally for Christine.
These proceedings uncoil in the movie as a true nightmare that would really be too strange for fiction and are eventually linked to the infamous Wineville Chicken Coop Murders at the hands of Gordon Northcott (Jason Butler Harner). As always, Eastwood, working from a screenplay by J. Michael Straczynski (best known for his sci-fi TV show,
Where the film and the screenplay show some limitations that prevent this movie from moving in the first rank of Eastwood’s directorial career is in the final act. There are many details to cover from the deepening corruption from the police chief, James E. Davis (Colm Feore) and Jones to the serial killer and they are certainly all part of the whole historical telling. Yet the screenplay feels too disjointed in checking off these points to finish in a clean emotional sweep. The story struggles to tie up all of its loose ends with multiple resolutions, and though I see why the movie ends on the note it does, it should have stayed closer to the heroine’s direct emotional perspective to give it greater impact rather than getting mired in the procedural minutiae in the end. And the tone of the ending, while not entirely upbeat, is still too neat and reassuring considering that this was only one of many cases of corruption in the police department.
As usual, however, Eastwood gets uniformly strong, memorable performances out of his cast that carry the film past its problems. Jolie thankfully seems to be returning to her acting roots and with A Mighty Heart and now this movie she may become the go-to actress to essay maternal figures that maintain patient grace under pressure during familial loss. It is also nice to see Malkovich play a really positive portrait of a preacher who not only sermonizes but backs up his sermons with action. And Amy Ryan, coming off her much-acclaimed role in Gone Baby Gone, so conceals her real-life beauty again to play a disheveled sister character to the one that Jolie won an Oscar® for back in 1999’s Girl, Interrupted. Even the child actors including Gattlin Griffith, Devon Conti and Sanford Clark as a teenager who comes forward with crucial information on the crime play some very tricky notes of traumatic emotional breakdown and poker-faced deception impeccably. Also deserving mention is Michael Kelly, a character actor who often specializes in playing a slime ball but here is allowed to portray the first cop in the story who realizes his proper duties after gazing through the prism of evil.
While the other villains in the story including Jeffrey Donovan and Colm Feore are also very solid, the best performance in the film comes from the least known actor, Jason Butler Harner as the murderous Gordon Northcott. Many films seek to psychoanalyze the crazed motivations of a serial killer but Harner somehow pulls off the more difficult challenge of just inhabiting the murderous insanity without calling out for any kind of explanation or understanding. That the character’s self-loathing and pity is rendered so scarily despite the movie’s background omission of the more sordid details of the involvement of his mother (whom he later discovered was actually his grandmother as he was the result of incest between his father and sister) is a tribute to Harner’s chilling work here.
All of this tie back to the old LAPD of the 1920s and 1930s to which Changeling paints an angry social critique of blatant fabrication and deception at the potential cost of human life and decency (and it is in keeping with Eastwood’s recurrent exploration of truth versus lies as in his previous two back-to-back war movies and Mystic River). For all the classic TV shows like Dragnet that glamorized the department as following their own motto, “to serve and protect,” cases like this one proved that what they were serving and protecting was not always the public citizens. And something people don’t learn enough of time and time again is the fact that one would do better to boost public image by properly and honestly leveling with the public rather than refusing to empathize with basic feelings like the wounding loss of a child.




0 comments:
Post a Comment